Tuesday, January 15, 2008

Vytorin : What's a Patient to Do?

If you've watched the news or read the newspaper, you probably know that there is some apparent controversy about the cholesterol drug Vytorin. The results of the study nicknamed ENHANCE were just released, and the results were not as favorable as hoped. However, there is no need to panic if you're taking Vytorin; the results showed nothing harmful either.
Vytorin (ezetimibe-simvastin) is a combination drug consisting of Zetia (ezetimibe) manufactured by Schering-Plough and Zocor (simvastatin) manufactured by Merck. Vytorin is designed to lower cholesterol, particularly LDL-cholesterol, and therefore decrease cardiac risk. This has been proven and is well-documented and the results of the ENHANCE trial do not refute that. However, The ENHANCE trial set out to determine if Vytorin reduced plaque in the carotid arteries more than simvastatin alone. The manufacturers were hoping for a resounding "Yes"; instead they got a "Same" result.
So what does it REALLY mean?? Is it bad for your heart? Well, it's not good for your blood pressure if you watched the shares of Merck and Schering-Plough go down this week on results of the news. However, let me reiterate: there is no cause to panic. Vytorin is still a very effective medication for reducing cholesterol; it's just that in this study, it did not show the hoped-for results in reducing plaque build-up better than simvastatin alone.
So, the question becomes should you take the more expensive Vytorin rather than the less expensive generic simvastain? Ultimately, that is a question you and your physician should discuss and determine what is best for you, taking into consideration other risk factors and co-morbid conditions.
My PERSONAL opinion is that Vytorin still offers benefits, since it's ingredients Zocor and Zetia have different mechanisms of actions in lowering cholesterol. And usually this means that the patient has an alternative to just increasing the dose of the statin, and thereby may lessen the chance of side effects. (Again, all drugs have side effects and the individual response may vary) Also, this study was a subset of 700 patients witha rare form of hypercholesterolemia that only occurs in about 1% of the population. There are more studies due out soon which look at more that 20,000 patients. I believe that waiting for these outcomes is worthwhile and may show a more relevant picture.
The ACC, American College of Cardiolgy, has released a statement which I have included below. Hopefully, that will allay the "drama" that the media loves so much.
"The ENHANCE (Effect of Combination Ezetimibe and High-Dose Simvastatin vs. Simvastatin Alone on the Atherosclerotic Process in Patients with Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia) trial results were released by Merck and Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals on January 14, 2008. The results of the trial show no benefit from the combination of ezetimibe (Zetia) and simvastatin (sold together as Vytorin) over simvastatin alone in terms of affecting the rate of atherosclerosis progression.The study involved 720 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and showed no significant difference in the primary endpoint between patients treated with ezetimibe and simvastatin versus patients treated with simvastatin alone over a two-year period. The study was designed to prove that Vytorin could slow the growth of plaque in carotid arteries supplying the brain more than simvastatin alone. Media reports indicate that the results of the trial show no benefit from the combination of ezetimibe (Zetia) and simvastatin (sold together as Vytorin) over simvastatin alone.The American College of Cardiology recommends that major clinical decisions not be made on the basis of the ENHANCE study alone.According to the American College of Cardiology (ACC), this study deserves serious thought and follow-up. The overall incidence rates of cardiac events were nearly identical between both treatment groups, and both medicines were generally well tolerated. There should no be reason for patients to panic. The difference in IMT changes between the simvastatin group and the Vytorin group was 0.006 mm vs. 0.011 mm.Health care professionals should speak to their concerned patients using this drug. The ACC is also releasing a public statement explaining that this is not an urgent situation and patients should never stop taking any prescribed medications without first discussing the issue with their health care professional. Further research will be needed in this area to provide conclusive evidence about which lipid lowering strategy is preferred (statin alone vs. statin plus ezetimibe).Furthermore, the ACC notes that this trial is an imaging study and not a clinical-outcome study. Conclusions should not be made until the three large clinical-outcome trials are presented within the next two to three years. The ACC recommends that Zetia remain a reasonable option for patients who are currently on a high dose statin but have not reached their goal. The ACC also notes that Zetia is a reasonable option for patients who cannot tolerate statins or can only tolerate a low dose statin.Reports also indicate that the ENHANCE trial has been submitted as an abstract to be presented at the upcoming American College of Cardiology Scientific Session in March, 2008. The late-breaking clinical trial selections by the meeting co-chairs are scheduled to occur in late January.For more information on the ENHANCE trial, please visit Cardiosource at http://www.cardiosource.com/clinicaltrials/trial.asp?trialID=1640.

4 comments:

madison said...

Thanks that is very informative. we have already received several phone calls from patients asking if they should continue vytorin. your post helps explain it to them

Anonymous said...

It appears you own stock in both of these companies.

Maggie said...

But what about the reported plaque build up that happens faster when using vytorin. Exactly the thing you are trying to avoid occurs with the vytorin. Margie

Srihari Yamanoor said...

Thanks for visiting my blog Jonni!

I personally believe that Merck could have avoided this implosion by reining in study experts sooner, and releasing the information alongside a good deal of patient education.

Just like with so many other cases, alas, another good opportunity missed and more shareholders disappointed!

Great Blog!